Educating Judges Outside Japan and Identifying Risk Factors for Parental Abduction
REWRITE Many judges lack experience with parental kidnapping cases and need to be educated about the problem and what they can do to prevent it. Be prepared to show the court why prevention provisions are needed. Focus arguments on three factors: (1) the risk of abduction; (2) the potential harm the child would likely suffer if abducted; and (3) obstacles to locating and recovering the child if an abduction were to occur. When the risk of abduction is high, the child is likely to be harmed, and obstacles to recovery exist that would be difficult to overcome, strict preventive measures are needed. END REWRITE
Japan Specific Materials
•Letter to Left Behind Parents and other US State Department evidence - This page documents evidence from the US State Department which may be useable in a US or other court of law to help you obtain supervised visitation, travel restraining orders, denial of a request to relocate, or other related court orders against a Japanese parent.
•Marbury v. Madison and The Matrix: What Child Custody and Visitation in Japan Show us about the Japanese Court System - Written by a western lawyer who is fluent in Japanese, this is the best overview available of the problems with Japanese family law. Published on the website of the Australian Network for Japanese Law.
•Case law precedents concerning a Japanese parent in a non-Japanese court - This listing is currently US centric, but if you have cases from other countries, just send them in for inclusion on this list. This also goes thru a number of specific requests for protective measure that you can request from a judge.
General Materials on Parental Abduction
REWRITE THIS VERBATIM FROM ANOTHER DOCUMENT - And get the document referenced.
A study entitled, Prevention of Parent or Family Abduction through Early Identification of Risk Factors, conducted by Dr. Janet Johnston (Judith Wallerstein Center for the Family in Transition) and Dr. Linda Girdner (ABA Center on Children and the Law), identified six personality profiles that may be helpful in predicting which parents may pose a risk of abduction.
The six profiles are:
•Parents who have threatened to abduct or abducted previously;
•Parents who are suspicious and distrustful due to a belief abuse has occurred and have social support for these beliefs;
•Parents who are paranoid-delusional;
•Parents who are sociopathic;
•Parents who have strong ties to another country and are ending a mixed-culture marriage;
•Parents who feel disenfranchised from the legal system (e.g., poor, minority, victim of abuse) and have family/social support.
b. How to obtain the study. Contact Howard Davidson, Director, ABA Center on Children and the Law, (202) 662-1740, or the Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse, (800) 638-8376. Two related articles may be found at: (1) Johnston, Janet and Girdner, Linda, Early Identification of Parents At Risk For Custody Violations and Prevention of Child Abductions, Family and Conciliation Courts Review, Vol. 36, No. 3, July 1998 392-409 and (2) Johnston, Janet R., L. Girdner, and I. Sagatun-Edwards, Developing Profiles of Risk for Parental Abduction of Children from a Comparison of Families Victimized by Abduction with Families Litigating Custody, Behav. Sci. Law 17:305:322 (1999).
END REWRITE
Present all available evidence of the predictors set forth in these documents, as well as any other relevant facts.
•Early Identification of Risk Factors for Parental Abduction (PDF). Johnston, J. R., & Girdner, L. K. (1998). Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 36, 392-409. A US Department of Justice document that is not specific to Japan, but is based on the results of four research projects designed identify the characteristics of abductors and their families and examine the effectiveness of interventions used to prevent or respond to child abductions. Some of the information is relevant to international child abductions and abduction and retention within Japan. (cached copy HTML or PDF)
•The Epidemic of Parental child-Snatching: An Overview An overview of parental kidnappings, written by Hon. Mr. William Rigler, New York Supreme Court, United States. It describes attempts to prevent parental child abduction, applicable US laws, and the Hague Convention. In particular, there are personality profiles of the type of parent at risk of abducting their children. (cached copy)
•Parental Kidnapping : Prevention and Remedies (Word doc); Patricia M. Hoff; Legal Consultant to the American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law; American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law; December 2000. This document has a good section on how to educate a judge about the dangers. There is also very specific advice for lawyers of the non-Japanese parent, cautioning them against taking the threat of abduction too lightly. Show this document to your lawyer. (cached copy)
•Resources for Judges on International Parental Child Abduction - Although not Japan specific, this US State Department website contains a lot of materials that are useful for educating judges about the overall problem of international parental abduction and identifying risky situations and personality types likely to abduct a child.
•Parental Child Abduction is Child Abuse by Nancy Faulkner, Ph.D Presented to the United Nations Convention on Child Rights in Special Session, June 9, 1999. (cached copy)
Press Articles
•Child custody in Japan isn't based on rules; San Francisco Chronicle; August 27, 2006. A law professor discusses why institutional reasons rather than cultural ones are to blame for bad family law in Japan. Much of Japan's family law is based on the need to cover up the fact that Japanese courts are powerless to enforce their own decisions. It contains an example of culturally biased opinions regarding visitation made by a prominent "family expert" in a book on visitation, as well as descriptions of apparently mainstream anti-visitation opinions expressed by family court mediators. Both of these, until now, were only available in Japanese. (cached copy)
The information on this website concerns a matter of public interest, and is provided for educational and informational purposes only in order to raise public awareness of issues concerning left-behind parents. Unless otherwise indicated, the writers and translators of this website are not lawyers nor professional translators, so be sure to confirm anything important with your own lawyer.
Copyright © 2003-2009 Contact us

Please bear with us while we reconstruct CRN Japan. You may find links that are broken and data that is not in it’s place. Please understand we are working to fix all issues. Thank you for your understanding.
Search CRN Japan
Help Now
News
CRN Press
Law
Resources
CRN Japan